Top section is general causes; section at bottom deals with
bra's specifically.
From
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g2601/is_0002/ai_2601000232
:
There are a number of risk factors for the development of
breast cancer, including:
- Family history of breast cancer in mother or sister
- Early onset of menstruation and late menopause
- Reproductive history: women who had no children or
have children late in life and women who have never
breastfed have increased risk
- History of abnormal breast biopsies .
However, more than 70% of women who get breast cancer
have no known risk factors. While a breast cancer gene was
discovered in 1994, only about 5% of breast cancers are
believed to be related to the gene.
In addition, some studies suggest that high fat diets,
bottle feeding instead of breastfeeding, or using alcohol
may contribute to the risk profile. Some studies have also
found that for certain women, hormone replacement therapy
may contribute to the development of breast cancer .
From
http://www.medindia.net/patients/patientinfo/breastcancer.htm
:
What are the causes of Breast Cancer ?
There are many factors for developing breast cancers.
However, the exact cause is not known. It is suspected that
more than one factor is involved. Also the risk of breast
cancer increases as a woman gets older.
Personal history of breast cancer: Women who have had breast
cancer face an increased risk of getting breast cancer in
their other breast.
Family history: A woman's risk for developing breast cancer
increases if her mother, sister, or daughter had breast
cancer, especially at a young age.
Late childbearing: Women who have their first child late
(after about age 30) have a greater chance of developing
breast cancer than women who have a child at a younger age.
Early Menstruation and Late Menopause : Women who started
their menstrual periods early (before age 12) or go through
menopause late (after age 55) are at higher risk.
Breast density: Breasts that have a high proportion of
lobular and ductal tissue appear dense on mammograms. Making
it more difficult for doctors to see abnormal areas on a
mammogram. Breast cancers nearly always develop in lobular
or ductal tissue (not fatty tissue). That's why cancer is
more likely to occur in breasts that have more lobular and
ductal tissue (that is, dense tissue) than in breasts with
more fatty tissue.
Obesity is a controversial risk factor: Some studies report
obesit individuals have a higher risk of breast cancer,
possibly associated with higher levels of estrogen
production in obese women.
Radiation therapy: Women whose breasts were exposed to
radiation before age 30, especially those who were treated
with radiation for Hodgkin's disease, are at an increased
risk for developing breast cancer. Studies show that the
younger a woman is while receiving radiation treatment, the
higher her risk for developing breast cancer later in life.
Alcohol : Some studies suggest a slightly higher risk of
breast cancer among women who drink alcohol (more than 3
drinks a day.)
Oral Contraceptives (birth control pills) : Birth control
pills may slightly increase the risk for breast cancer,
depending on age, length of use, and other factors.
Hormone Replacement Therapy : More than 5 years of use has
been shown to slightly increase the risk of breast cancer
and it is found to increase with longer periods of usage.
Estrogen pills : Women consuming diethylstilbestrol (DES) to
prevent miscarriage may have an increased risk of breast
cancer.
Chemicals : Some studies have pointed to exposure to
estrogen - like chemicals that are found in pesticides and
other industrial products as a possible increased risk of
breast cancer.
From
http://www.medicinenet.com/cancer_causes/article.htm
Tobacco
Tobacco causes cancer. In fact, smoking tobacco, using
"smokeless" tobacco, and being regularly exposed to
environmental tobacco smoke without actually smoking are
responsible for one-third of all cancer deaths in the United
States each year. Tobacco use is the most preventable cause
of death in this country.
Smoking accounts for more than 85 percent of all lung
cancer deaths. If you smoke, your risk of getting lung
cancer is affected by the number and types of cigarettes you
smoke and how long you have been smoking. Overall, for those
who smoke one pack a day, the chance of getting lung cancer
is about 10 times greater than for nonsmokers. Smokers are
also more likely than nonsmokers to develop several other
types of cancer (such as
oral cancer and cancers of the larynx, esophagus,
pancreas, bladder, kidney, and cervix). The risk of cancer
begins to decrease when a smoker quits, and the risk
continues to decline gradually each year after quitting.
The use of smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco and snuff)
causes cancer of the mouth and throat. Precancerous
conditions, or tissue changes that may lead to cancer, begin
to go away after a person stops using smokeless tobacco.
Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, also called
involuntary smoking, increases the risk of lung cancer for
nonsmokers. The risk goes up 30 percent or more for a
nonsmoking spouse of a person who smokes. Involuntary
smoking causes about 3,000 lung cancer deaths in this
country each year.
If you use tobacco in any form and you need help
quitting, talk with your doctor or dentist, or join a
smoking cessation group sponsored by a local hospital or
voluntary organization. For information on such groups or
other programs, call the Cancer Information Service
(1-800-422-6237) or the American Cancer Society
(1-800-227-2345).
Diet
Your choice of foods may affect your chance of developing
cancer. Evidence points to a link between a high-fat diet
and certain cancers, such as cancer of the breast, colon,
uterus, and prostate. Being seriously overweight appears to
be linked to increased rates of cancer of the prostate,
pancreas, uterus, colon, and ovary, and to breast cancer in
older women. On the other hand, studies suggest that foods
containing
fiber and certain nutrients help protect us against some
types of cancer.
You may be able to reduce your cancer risk by making some
simple food choices. Try to have a varied, well-balanced
diet that includes generous amounts of foods that are high
in fiber, vitamins, and minerals. At the same time, try to
cut down on fatty foods. You should eat five servings of
fruits and vegetables each day, choose more whole-grain
breads and cereals, and cut down on eggs, high-fat meat,
high-fat dairy products (such as whole milk, butter, and
most cheeses), salad dressings, margarine, and cooking oils.
For more, please read the
Healthy Living article.
Sunlight
Ultraviolet radiation from the sun and from other sources
(such as sunlamps and tanning booths) damages the skin and
can cause
skin cancer . Repeated exposure to ultraviolet radiation
increases the risk of skin cancer, especially if you have
fair skin or freckle easily. The sun's ultraviolet rays are
strongest during the summer from about 11 a.m. to about 3
p.m. (daylight savings time). The risk is greatest at this
time, when the sun is high overhead and shadows are short.
As a rule, it is best to avoid the sun when your shadow is
shorter than you are.
Protective clothing, such as a hat and long sleeves, can
help block the sun's harmful rays. You can also use
sunscreens to help protect yourself. Sunscreens are rated in
strength according to their SPF (sun protection factor),
which ranges from 2 to 30 and higher. Those rated 15 to 30
block most of the sun's harmful rays.
Alcohol
Drinking large amounts of alcohol increases the risk of
cancer of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and larynx. (People
who smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol have an especially
high risk of getting these cancers). Alcohol can damage the
liver and increase the risk of liver cancer. Some studies
suggest that drinking alcohol also increases the risk of
breast cancer . So if you drink at all, do so in
moderation, not more than one or two drinks a day.
Radiation
Exposure to large doses of radiation from medical x-rays can
increase the risk of cancer. X-rays used for diagnosis
expose you to very little radiation and the benefits nearly
always outweigh the risks. However, repeated exposure can be
harmful, so it is a good idea to talk with your doctor or
dentist about the need for each x-ray and ask about the use
of shields to protect other parts of your body.
Before 1950, x-rays were used to treat noncancerous
conditions (such as an enlarged thymus, enlarged tonsils and
adenoids,
ringworm of the scalp, and
acne ) in children and young adults. People who have
received radiation to the head and neck have a
higher-than-average risk of developing
thyroid cancer years later. People with a history of
such treatments should report it to their doctor and should
have a careful exam of the neck every 1 or 2 years.
Chemicals and Other Substances In The Workplace
Being exposed to substances such as metals, dust, chemicals,
or pesticides at work can increase the risk of cancer.
Asbestos, nickel, cadmium, uranium, radon, vinyl chloride,
benzidine, and benzene are well-known examples of
carcinogens in the workplace. These may act alone or along
with another carcinogen, such as cigarette smoke. For
example, inhaling asbestos fibers increases the risk of lung
diseases, including cancer, and the cancer risk is
especially high for asbestos workers who smoke. It is
important to follow work and safety rules to avoid contact
with dangerous materials.
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Many women use
estrogen therapy to control the
hot flashes, vaginal dryness, and
osteoporosis (thinning of the bones) that can occur
during
menopause . However, studies show that estrogen uses
increases the risk of cancer of the uterus. Other studies
suggest an increased risk of breast cancer among women who
have used high doses of estrogen or have used estrogen for a
long time. At the same time, taking estrogen may reduce the
risk of heart disease and osteoporosis.
The risk of uterine cancer appears to be less when
progesterone is used with estrogen than when estrogen is
used alone. But some scientists are concerned that the
addition of progesterone may also increase the risk of
breast cancer.
Researchers are still studying and finding new
information about the risks and benefits of taking
replacement hormones. A woman considering
hormone replacement therapy should discuss these issues
with her doctor.
Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
DES is a form of estrogen that doctors prescribed from
the early 1940s until 1971 to try to prevent
miscarriage . In some daughters of women who were given
DES during pregnancy, the uterus, vagina, and cervix do not
develop normally. DES-exposed daughters also have an
increased chance of developing abnormal cells (dysplasia) in
the cervix and vagina. In addition, a rare type of vaginal
and cervical cancer has been found in a small number of
DES-exposed daughters. Women who took DES during pregnancy
may have a slightly increased risk of developing breast
cancer. DES-exposed mothers and daughters should inform
their doctor about this exposure. DES daughters should have
regular special pelvic exams by a doctor familiar with
conditions related to DES.
Exposure to DES before birth does not appear to increase
the risk of cancer in DES-exposed sons. However,
reproductive and urinary system problems may occur. These
men should inform the doctor and have regular medical
checkups.
Close Relatives With Certain Types of Cancer
A small number of cancers (including
melanoma and cancers of the breast, ovary, and colon)
tend to occur more often in some families than in the rest
of the population. It is not always clear whether a pattern
of cancer in a family is due to heredity, factors in the
family's environment, or chance. Still, if close relatives
have been affected by cancer, it is important to let your
doctor know this and then follow the doctor's advice about
cancer prevention and checkups to detect problems early.
What would you do to reduce
your risk of Breast Cancer?
Would you change your clothes?
"The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras"
A two year study, completed in 1993 and published in 1995
asked questions of 4,500 women in 5 cities across the U.S.
about their habits in purchasing and wearing bras. The study
also asked the individual's age, income level, exposure to
radiation and toxins, attitude towards appearance, bra
wearing history, habits and comfort factor, and whether they
had been diagnosed with breast cancer. To minimize the
number of genetic variables in the study, all women were
Caucasians. To aid in the analysis, it was desired that
about an equal number of women who had been previously
diagnosed with breast cancer (2,056) be interviewed as those
without (2,444).
The purpose of the study was to try and determine whether
bra wearing was in any way connected with the development of
breast cancer. The notion that clothing may affect the inner
workings of your body can be difficult to accept. Yet the
researchers were looking at the possible interference of a
basic system of the body by the garments worn. This body
structure, which is often associated with the treatment of
breast cancer, is the lymphatic system. You may have heard
of someone who had lymph nodes removed as part of a
mastectomy procedure.
It may be hard to believe, but a cause for breast cancer
has never been determined, despite all the research money
that has been spent. There have been many studies that
characterize women who are at higher risk for the disease,
but these risk factors are not associated with a root cause.
For example, it has been shown that affluent women are at
higher risk for breast cancer than poor women. But affluence
is not a cause, it is only a correlation or risk factor. The
cause, however, may be associated with the culture and
lifestyle of the affluent.
The medical basis behind this theory is rooted in the
function of the lymphatic system and its physical location
within the body. The importance of the lymphatic system is
that many of the toxins that accumulate around the
individual cells are washed away by the lymph fluid. While
as extensive and complex as the blood's circulatory system,
instead of having a main pump for circulation (the heart),
the lymphatic has a collection of pockets (lymph nodes) and
relies on one-way valves (as in veins) and body motion (such
as walking and breathing) to accomplish the circulation of
lymph fluid.
The link between the lymphatic system's role in washing
toxins from cell tissue and the potential for cancer is
simple. The many cancer causing toxins that are in our
environment require time in contact with individual cells to
begin the mutation into cancer cells. If the lymphatic fluid
is prevented from circulating, the toxins remain in contact
with the cells for longer periods of time.
The effect of clothing on the proper operation of the
lymphatic system is largely influenced by the fact that the
lymph vessels are very delicate and close to the surface of
the skin. They are easily constricted by elastic or tight
fitting garments. The bra, by its very design, constricts
the lymph vessels responsible for removing toxins from the
cells in the breast tissue.
This is the basis of the theory presented by Sydney Ross
Singer and Soma Grismaijer as published in their book,
Dressed To Kill.
1
If the wearing of a bra affects the function of the
lymphatic system, then a woman's attitude toward her
appearance and her habits in bra wearing should coincide
with the development and diagnosis of breast cancer.
They write, "If a particular lifestyle predisposes women
to breast cancer, we might be able to characterize women
with breast cancer as a subculture--a smaller culture that
exists within the larger culture. Since this particular
lifestyle choice pertains to the wearing of bras, we would
expect women with breast cancer and women without breast
cancer to differ from each other in the way they wear their
bras. And since lifestyles are related to attitudes and
values, we would also expect that to accompany their
different brawearing behavior, women in the breast cancer
subculture would have different attitudes and values about
their bras and breasts."
2
They postulated that if a malfunction of the lymphatic
system, caused by tight fitting bras, was responsible for
the concentration of cancer causing toxins within the
breasts, then a correlation would be found between the bra
wearing habits of women and the incidence of breast cancer
in these women. Their theory was reinforced by the fact that
most benign lumps and cysts found in the breasts are largely
composed of lymph fluid. They found reports that women
diagnosed with these lumps could often have them completely
disappear by ceasing to wear their bra for several weeks.
So what did the study show? While there is not room to
present all the results of their study, the relevant
information is presented below. To the question, "Are you
comfortable with the size and shape of your breasts without
a bra?" 18% of the Standard (non-cancer) group responded
yes, while only 5% of the Cancer group responded yes. "Do
you select bras to shape or accentuate your breasts?"
Standard group: 74% yes; Cancer group: 87% yes. "Other than
price, what is the most important feature you look for when
buying a bra?" Standard group: 30% appearance; 51% comfort;
Cancer group: 62% appearance; 25% comfort.
3
This first set of questions shows that the selection of
bras to enhance appearance was more important to the group
that had been diagnosed with breast cancer. A bra that
enhances appearance must, by necessity, squeeze and pull the
breast tissue into position. One would expect this shaping
to be evidenced by discomfort or red indentations on the
skin.
"Does your bra ever make red marks on your skin or cause
irritations?" Standard group: 23% always; Cancer group: 40%
always. The red marks are a clear indication that the
lymphatic vessels are being constricted just below the skin
and unable to perform their job of cleansing the breast
tissue. "How long do you wear your bra each day on the
average?" Standard group: 20% less than 12 hours daily, 80%
more than 12 hours. Cancer group: 1% less than 12 hours
daily, 99% more than 12 hours. "Do you wear a bra to sleep?"
Standard group: 3% yes; Cancer group, 18% yes.
4
One might expect that the longer the lymph vessels are
constricted, the longer the toxins will be in contact with
the breast tissue and hence the higher the likelihood of
breast cancer.
So how do these survey results relate to the chance of
developing breast cancer? The average white American woman
wears her bra for more than 12 hours a day. From the survey
results the authors have determined that, "The average white
American woman is 19 times more likely to develop breast
cancer than is a woman who wears a bra for less than twelve
hours daily." Remember that some of these women claimed not
to wear bras at all. In the sub-group of women who do wear
bras, "women who wear bras for over twelve hours daily, but
not to sleep, have a 21-fold greater chance of developing
breast cancer than do women who remove their bras before
twelve hours."
5
Remember that nearly 20% of the population wear a bra to
bed, meaning the bra is constricting their breasts
essentially 24 hours a day. The researchers write, "When we
compare those women who wear their bras for less than twelve
hours a day to those who wear them twenty-four hours a day,
we see an enormous and extremely significant difference in
breast cancer rates. Women who wear their bras all the time
have a 113-fold increase in breast cancer incidence when
compared with women who wear their bras less than twelve
hours daily!"
6
So how do these numbers relate to the real world? The
risk of developing lung cancer by smoking cigarettes is
about 10 to 30 times higher than for people who don't smoke.
The risk of developing breast cancer by wearing a bra more
than 12 hours a day is 21 times higher than for women who
remove their bra before that 12 hours. Wearing a bra is
equivalent to smoking cigarettes as a cancer risk!
What is the price of fashion? Are the fashion demands of
western culture killing our women? Have women become
addicted to this under garment? Smoking is for many a
chemical addiction. Stopping can be physically challenging.
Bra wearing is a psychological addiction, or hopefully, just
a habit for you. You can reduce your cancer risk by
dispensing with this one garment. By properly selecting your
outer garments, no one but you will notice.
Dare to try this for just one week. Choose your outfits
to be comfortable, bra-less, but not revealing. I know you
will feel strange at first, but stick with it. See if any
one notices. (They won't.) See if you don't feel much more
comfortable at the end of the week. (You will.) And best of
all, you will have the peace of mind that the toxins,
attempting to do damage in your breasts are being naturally
removed by a properly operating lymphatic system. You can't
guarantee that breast cancer will never shatter your life.
But you can reduce your risk, simply by changing your
clothes!
1
Sydney Ross Singer and Soma Grismaijer, Dressed to Kill,
(Avery Publishing Group, New York, 1995). ISBN 0-89529-664-0
Available from The Naturist Society, P.O. Box 132 , Oshkosh
, WI 54902 , Tel.414-426-5009.
2
Ibid. p. 87-88.
3
Ibid. p. 102-105.
4
Ibid. p.110-116.
5
Ibid. p. 125.
6
Ibid. p. 126.
Copyright 1996, Jeff Rockel, All Rights Reserved.
Duplication permitted in its entirety.
BRAS AND BREAST CANCER
A Recent Article by Nguyen Phawk Yu, M.D.
or years, a lot of articles with regards to the causes of
breast cancer point to an unhealthy diet and lack of
exercise as the major links to this disease which happens to
be the biggest killer among women during these last two
decades. These studies would have been almost credible if it
were not for the fact that several women (including Linda
McCartney) who have been religious vegetarians and
exercise-freaks have also been unfortunate in suffering
breast cancer. Perhaps the most convincing article I have
ever read with regards to this matter, published in Chinese,
is one which links breast cancer to the wearing of bras.
In the "Bra and Breast Cancer Study" in the United States ,
it was discovered that women with breast cancer had a
history of sporting tighter and longer bra-wearing than did
the women who had not (yet) developed the disease. In fact,
virtually all of the cancer group wore bras over 12 hours
daily with 18% even sleeping with their bras which means
they wore bras 24 hours daily. In contrast, the comparison
groups had 25% of the women either bra-free or wearing bras
less than 12 hours daily. Only 3% of this group slept with
their bras on. This study revealed a significant link
between bras and breast cancer that is three times greater
than the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer!
There was a 125 fold increase in breast cancer incidence
between women who were bra-free and those who wore bras 24
hours daily. Wearing a bra over 12 hours daily conferred a
113 fold increase in breast cancer incidence! Bras apply
pressure to the breasts, especially to the lymphatic system.
The lymphatic system consists of tiny, thin-walled vessels
that drain from the breast tissue, removing toxins, cell
debris, cancer cells, viruses, bacteria, and other products
from the breasts. All of our tissues drain through the
lymphatics, which is essentially the circulatory pathway of
the immune system. However, unlike arteries and veins,
these vessels have no internal pressure. As a result, they
are easily compressed by external pressure (a bra, for
instance) leading to the congestion of the tissues that
would otherwise have been drained. When a woman wears a
tight bra, she subjects her breasts to pressure, closing off
the lymphatic pathway from the breast to the nodes. This
causes fluid build-up, swelling, tenderness and cyst
formation. Toxins must be flushed out via the lymphatics.
However, a bra-constricted breast cannot adequately perform
this cleansing process, resulting in toxin accumulation in
the breast. Truthfully, bras are creating droopy, weak
breasts...the breast relies on the bra for artificial
support, the body loses its ability to support the breast by
itself. This is why many women feel uncomfortable without a
bra. What is the solution to breast cancer then? DON'T WEAR
A TIGHT BRA! And maybe sleep without them. There is a
remarkable success rate for recovery from fibrocystic breast
disease within 10 days to two weeks of going bra-free. Many
women have tried going bra-less and recorded a miraculous
improvement in their health!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thank you for your
kind attention, Nguyen Phawk Yu, M.D.
His USA data was apparently taken from the book by Singer
and Grismaijer ( Dressed to Kill, Avery Press, 1995).
To test his theory, Singer compared women in Fiji ,
half of whom wear bras, half of whom go without. Singer
found the bra-wearers get breast cancer at the same rate US
women do. But, the Fijian women who don't wear bras have
almost no incidence of breast cancer. Both groups share the
same living environment and diet.
Their study (not medically supported) of over 4,700 women
gave the following results: Women who wore their bras 24
hours per day had a
3 out of 4 chance of
developing breast cancer (in their study, n=2056 for the
cancer group and n=2674 for the standard group). Women who
wore bras more than 12 hour per day but not to bed had a
1 out of 7 risk. Women who wore their
bras less than 12 hours per day had a
1 out of 152
risk. Women who wore bras rarely or never, had a
1 out of 168 chance of getting breast
cancer. The overall difference between 24 hour wearing and
not at all was a 125-fold difference. The Medical
profession of course claimed it was a faulted study (not
approved by them) but when you have risks falling from
3 in 4 to
1 in 133 you
must be rather stupid to say there is no "bra" effect!